Behaving Badly HQ
Behaving Badly HQ
  • Home
  • Research
    • The Investigation
    • Work Absurdities Report
    • The Vault
    • The Deep Dive
    • The Brief
    • Field Notes
  • Services
    • Work with BBHQ
    • Orientation Sessions
    • Institutions/Associations
    • Insight Sessions
  • Approach
    • Overview
    • Satirical Sensemaking
    • Reclaim Method
  • Founders Notebook
  • Submit a Story
  • About
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • Research
      • The Investigation
      • Work Absurdities Report
      • The Vault
      • The Deep Dive
      • The Brief
      • Field Notes
    • Services
      • Work with BBHQ
      • Orientation Sessions
      • Institutions/Associations
      • Insight Sessions
    • Approach
      • Overview
      • Satirical Sensemaking
      • Reclaim Method
    • Founders Notebook
    • Submit a Story
    • About
    • Resources
    • Contact
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Access The Squeeze Conditions Assessment

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Research
    • The Investigation
    • Work Absurdities Report
    • The Vault
    • The Deep Dive
    • The Brief
    • Field Notes
  • Services
    • Work with BBHQ
    • Orientation Sessions
    • Institutions/Associations
    • Insight Sessions
  • Approach
    • Overview
    • Satirical Sensemaking
    • Reclaim Method
  • Founders Notebook
  • Submit a Story
  • About
  • Resources
  • Contact

Account

  • My Account
  • Sign out

  • Sign In
  • My Account
Access The Squeeze Conditions Assessment

A Practice for Finding Orientation in Complexity

Satirical Sensemaking ™  is a practice for navigating complexity by treating absurdity, irony, and lived organizational stories as data. 

Rather than dismissing humor, contradictions, or “this makes no sense” moments as noise, the practice reads them as signals 

about system conditions that are difficult to name directly.


Satirical Sensemaking operates upstream of formal sensemaking and narrative capture. It surfaces early, socially compressed signals 

that often appear before people are able or willing to articulate experiences as stories or data.


This work does not aim to entertain, diagnose, or fix organizations. It supports orientation by helping people see what 

is shaping behavior, judgment, and decision-making before formal indicators make it visible. 

This practice also informs a forthcoming book on satirical sense-making and orientation in complex systems. 

Why It Exists

 In complex environments, coherence is often demanded faster than shared understanding can form. When this happens, systems do not simply fail. They produce signals.


Those signals frequently show up as:


  • Repeated jokes or ironic commentary
  • Absurd workarounds that quietly become normal
  • Stories people tell to make sense of contradictory demands
  • Performative alignment that masks uncertainty


Satirical Sensemaking exists to make these signals visible and usable, without collapsing complexity into simplified explanations or rushing toward action.

What This Practice Focuses On

Satirical Sensemaking examines patterns such as:


  • Recurring absurdities across organizations and leadership contexts
  • Humor and irony as early indicators of sensemaking strain
  • Decision load and fatigue at the system level
  • Gaps between formal intent and lived experience
  • Moments where action is demanded ahead of understanding


The practice pays particular attention to socially compressed language: jokes, irony, shorthand, and recurring humor that function as rapid sense-checks inside groups.


These patterns are explored as qualitative data about system conditions, not as individual shortcomings or culture problems.

How Satirical Sensemaking Works

The Facilitator Role & The 4 Key Moves

In satirical sense-making sessions, stories, humor, irony, and contradictions are shared within the group to slow the sense-making process long enough for signals to become visible. The facilitator’s role is not to interpret on behalf of participants, diagnose problems, or offer solutions.


Instead, the facilitator:

  • holds the conditions that allow patterns to surface 
  • supports the group in noticing what stories and reactions may be indicating about system dynamics 
  • helps make contradictions visible without resolving them prematurely
     

By doing this, shared orientation begins to form. As patterns become clearer, judgment stabilizes. 

From that shared orientation, groups are better able to make decisions, navigate trade-offs, and move forward with 

greater coherence after the session. The work is not about arriving at agreement in the room. It is about creating enough clarity 

that participants can carry better judgment and decision-making back into their real contexts.


 The practice follows a small number of consistent moves:


  1. Observe lived experience
    Attention is paid to stories, behaviors, jokes, and contradictions that persist across contexts.
  2. Name the absurdity
    What feels off, ironic, or nonsensical is surfaced without ridicule or blame.
  3. Interpret the signal
    Absurdity is examined as information about coherence, pressure, pace, and constraint within the system.
  4. Support collective orientation
    Shared understanding is strengthened so judgment and decision-making can travel further.


This work stops at orientation. It does not prescribe solutions, interventions, or operating models.

Request a Session

What This Enables

 Through Satirical Sensemaking, individuals, teams, and institutions gain:


  • Clearer orientation within complex conditions
  • Language to name what is difficult to say directly
  • Greater confidence distinguishing signal from noise
  • More grounded judgment about timing, trade-offs, and next steps


The impact is often subtle but durable. Conversations shift. Decisions stabilize. Pressure decreases without lowering standards.

How This Work is Used

 Satirical Sensemaking may be applied through:


  • Upstream orientation and sensemaking conversations, often preceding formal narrative capture or analysis
  • Institutional or executive briefings on observed patterns
  • Field reports and synthesis of recurring signals
  • Inquiry partnerships with institutions, associations, and leadership communities

The structure follows the conditions under examination, not a predefined format.

How This Relates to Reclaim

Satirical Sensemaking is a foundational practice.


Reclaim is a broader orientation practice currently in development, focused on how individuals and leaders sustain integrity, capacity, and judgment over time in complex conditions.

Insights generated through Satirical Sensemaking inform and feed the Reclaim work, but the two are distinct. Satirical Sensemaking helps people see. Reclaim supports how people live with what they see over time.

Don’t ask what the world needs.
Ask what makes you come alive. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.”

―Howard Thurman

BBHQ™ and Behaving Badly HQ™ are trademarks of The InSpark! Group Inc. 

All rights reserved. © 2025 

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept

Curious ?

Subscribe to the bi-weekly, BBHQ Corner. Be the first to hear offers, get The Brief, Deep Dive, resources and announcements. 

Subscribe